|
Gaylene Preston
Film Director/Producer
I'm really honoured
to be here. This is definitely 'me out of my box'.
I don't usually get invited to
conferences
and I've found every speaker so inspiring. It's been
a wonderful day for me.
I am an expatriate returned. I ran away when I was
21. I couldn't wait to get out of this country and
I lived
in Britain for seven years and then came back. To
the consternation of my parents I started to look
as if
I was going to be a film maker. I remember my father,
who
was contemplating retirement, came to me just after
I'd made my first film and he offered me his milk
run in
Napier. He was really serious and he said: 'Look
love, you'd have steady money coming in every week,'
and
he was right. To his real puzzlement and a certain
despair
I couldn't take up what was really quite a good offer,
because you see, I had heard the call and was about
to spend the next 20 years or so of my life poking
my nose
and sometimes - money permitting and technology being
available - my cameras into other people's business.
This is a very privileged position to have, particularly
over the time that I have been able to do it. It's
not about book learning. It's been me watching compulsively
and wrapping a box around reality and recording it.
What most occurs to me is the difference between
the myth and the reality of who we think we are.
As a precocious
three-year-old and four-year-old who had an interest
in reciting A. A. Milne at every dog fight I would
often find myself at the local concert slotted in
between the
man who played the saw and Mr Swift who could whistle
like various birds. I grew up going around the local
traps at all the local concerts. When I got a bit
older I heard that I was living in a 'cultural desert'.
I
wondered what that was. I knew more about my culture
than I did
about geography so I decided that a desert must be
a rather wonderful place, because I didn't think
that I
was growing up in a cultural deprived environment.
Quite the contrary.
We've talked today about ingeniousness and our fantastic
creative abilities with no.8 wire and other such
things. However, I think there is a downside to this
in that
while everybody was making those fantastic spare
parts they were also thinking that it would be better
if
they could have bought one. "It's nearly as good as a
bought one!" That was high praise indeed. So we've
had this funny sort of dichotomy of not really valuing
what we do and who we are.
I was brought up understanding that we are a taciturn
bunch. The strong silent type. Yet the world I grew
up in was a chatty one. We are great ravers. New
Zealanders are fantastic speakers and this conference
today is
a
good example of that. So with great gusto I ignored
my father's great offer and leaped into the future.
I've
been wrapping a camera around things, and great New
Zealand ravers have been part of my real interest.
I also come from a therapy background. After I went
to art school I spent seven years in Britain working
in
psychiatric hospitals, in prisons and in various
institutions as an art and drama therapist. That
experience has
informed my approach to the world as I've been interested
in hearing
voices that have a problem asserting themselves.
As an art and drama therapist my role in psychiatric
institutions
was often to centre on the one-third of the hospital
population who couldn't be a part of group therapy
because
they didn't, wouldn't, couldn't talk. So I've been
interested in the non-verbal therapies.
I obviously wanted to look at the edges of this little
country in order to try to understand it for myself.
It wasn't long before I realised that in the public
domain some of these voices that were on the edge
were also
the forbidden voices.
The first film I made was about Bruce Burgess, a
severely handicapped young man who wanted to climb
Mount Ruapehu
and Graham Dingle, a rather spectacular New Zealander
who decided that Bruce should go all the way up there.
The first clip that I want to show you is of Bruce.
When we got the money to make this film the one thing
we were
told by the broadcaster was not to let Bruce speak.
Do a nice commentary, have pretty pictures, do not
interview
Bruce. But I knew that Bruce's voice had to be the
centre of the film. So, of course, we did let him
speak and
we'll have a look at that now.
All The Way Up There 1978
Bruce Burgess sits in his wheelchair, his arms flailing
out of control, his tongue fighting to articulate
the barely discernible words that are subtitled on
the
screen. A photo of Ruapehu dominates the wall behind
him.
Bruce: "This picture made me wonder - I want to
climb that mountain. I would die for that dream. I'm
going to do it!""I'm going to do it!" That
piece of film and that phrase has come to be a thumbprint
for the kind of culture that I came back to in 1977.
It's not that long ago, but we didn't quite have our
own voice. In 1978 when Sleeping Dogs was shown there
was a big problem that everybody was really worried about
in the film industry, or in what we called in those days
the fledgling film industry. Would the New Zealand audience
accept the New Zealand accent on screen and not be embarrassed
by it? Up till then they had been. Sleeping Dogs was
a real watershed in that it was one of the first times
that the New Zealand accent was accepted on screen broadly
by its own audience, by us, New Zealanders.
What Jamie Belich said this morning has really made
sense to me in terms of decolonization. His theory
explains
why as New Zealanders we are a fantastically chatty,
terribly passionate, totally driven people, who have
taken so long to find a confident voice with which
to express ourselves. Again we have this problem
with our
myth and our reality. I didn't grow up in a world
where I thought of New Zealanders as thinkers. It
was as
if the thinkers came from somewhere else. This audience
apart, I have to say that the most thoughtful audience
I've ever spoken to was the Wanganui Federated Farmers.
It was really daunting to be an after dinner speaker
for the Wanganui Federated Farmers because they were
into the big issues. I don't know what it is. Maybe
they
drive around on their tractors with half their brains
counting their sheep or whatever and the other half
thinking about the big stuff.
I believe we are thinkers. I think we are driven
by ideas. I think that is our strength and it is
also
our weakness
because, of course, we get pretty gung-ho about ideas.
We tend towards totalitarian, we're extremists, we're
ideological extremists and I think the history of
this country in this century proves that. I have
to call
myself a real Kiwi in this respect.
However, it is unnerving that a lot of the ideas
that I have felt gung-ho about in my life look daft
20 years
later in retrospect. Some of them were really silly.
For example, I somehow managed to link being a feminist
with having a vagina and that was a real problem.
I don't think an idea is about a piece of genitalia.
Judith Fyfe is a friend and colleague of mine who
founded the New Zealand Oral History Centre with
Hugo Manson.
Judith says that life is lived in retrospect and,
of course, it is. I want to show you a clip from
a film
I made, Bread and Roses, which points out that some
ideas that we have strongly held in the past, at
best, can
be daft, and at worst, can be barbaric.Bread and
Roses 1993Sonja, a student nurse at Wellington hospital,
struggles with large screens for a woman who wants
a bedpan during
the ward clean up for breakfast time. Maisie, another
student nurse, collects eggs from people who have
marked
them with specific instructions of how they like
them cooked.
A voice calls Sonja to another cubicle where a ward
sister asks her to roll over a patient - a young
woman. As she
does so Sonja realises this woman is dead. The sister
asks her to wait while she gets a shroud. Sonja is
horrified. As she looks out through the curtain she
sees a grieving
family and a young soldier being ushered away by
the ward sister who returns with the shroud. As she
shows
Sonja how to wrap a body they talk.
"First time?" Sonja nods.
"Won't be the last. Do you know what an abortion is?" Sonja nods but
she obviously doesn't.
"She got pregnant, he got posted, so she went to a back street butcher.
Soldier boy just got back. He's over there now."
Sonja is pale and shocked. The sister stops for a moment before she places
a rose on the now tidily wrapped body.
"You'll have to toughen up kid or you won't survive."
Sonja walks on the town belt and is joined by the others - all wearing red
capes, all young women just like the one we have seen disposed of. Maisie
puts a reassuring arm on Sonja's shoulder.Sonja says that the deaths of New
Zealand
women during the Second World War were war deaths just as surely as if
they'd been shot. Of course, there is no list of names. They're an invisible
force,
we don't remember them on Anzac Day. We had a try at researching this and,
of course, you can't because those deaths were deaths, technically speaking,
from peritonitis. There's just no way you can ever find out. So secrets
get buried forever.
I've spent quite a bit of my film-making life exploring the Second World
War, partly because it happened just before I was born. It is a way for
me to try
to make sense of who I am and where I come from. Also it is because New
Zealand seemed to be a place of real extremes during World War Two. As
we're extremists
I've had to explore the extremes.
The next clip I'm going to show you is from a film I made called War Stories
Our Mothers Never Told Us, which actually had my mother's story in it,
which she did eventually tell us. Unfortunately, she had a daughter who
was a film
maker and that meant that when she told me she told the world. I am not
going to show you my mother here. I'm going to show you Rita Graham who
was a nice
girl in Auckland growing up during the war. She met and fell in love with
a handsome young bank teller before the war. During the war Rita realised
that
she was a Roses married to a Christian pacifist. Rather than go to war
he preferred to go to jail and Rita was left living with the consequences.
War Stories Our Mothers Never Told Us 1995
Rita Graham talks of the huge effort that was behind the War effort. We
see a weekly revue montage showing huge crowds waving and cheering tanks
and
planes in a large military parade that raised enormous funds for the war
effort.
Rita tells us a story.
" There was a man - I'm happy to mention his name - Campbell Patterson.
He worked with Alan in the bank. He went to the bank manager and said, 'All the
boys
who have gone away from the bank have been given a gold watch, and we'd like
to give a gold watch to Alan.'
" Well, the bank manager was furious. An insult to the boys who'd gone away.
So Campbell went back with a man who worked in the bank, who'd lost an eye.
And he said that he was sure the boys at the front wouldn't mind but the bank
manager wouldn't hear of it. So Campbell went amongst the staff and every week
collected threepences and sixpences - I know the largest amount anyone gave
was a shilling - and the whole time Alan was in detention they put ten shillings
into my bank account every week. So much better than a gold watch and of much
greater value to me."
I'd like to celebrate the Campbell Patterson factor because I think that
is also a real part of who we are and what our national culture is. As
a nation
we've been brave and we have actually taken stands. Often these have not
been for ourselves but on behalf of other people like the whole stand that
we made
against apartheid regarding sporting contacts that culminated in the1981
protests. I think we do take risks, I think we think outside the square.
It is harder
when you've got mortgages to pay and proper jobs and dependants, and that
is the test for us in this room. The more power I have the harder it is
for me
to make stands, there is more at stake. But we have got much better at
arguing and that is a real step forward. We started a really vociferous
argument
in this country in 1981. There are still lots of arguments to be had. I
was very
privileged to be able to record some of the cultural arguments that went
on in the making of This Place, Our Place Te Papa Tongarewa, when this
institution was trying to make a place to house our national culture. I
am going to show
you a clip from a recent documentary I made with Anna Cottrell called Getting
to Our Place. It's screening next Friday on Channel 1 at 8.30. I will just
show you a piece to illustrate the way that we've got braver in our arguments.
This is a particularly brave argument given that there is a camera in the
room.
Getting to Our Place 1999
Sir Ron Trotter and Cliff Whiting meet with Cheryll Sotheran to discuss
the kawa of the marae still in construction at Te Papa.
Trotter: I gather it's not going to be entirely traditional, and I'm anxious
to think that the developing ideas that will be into the next millennium
are... respecting the past, and taking the best from the past, but being
a little
more liberal. If we have a concept of a place to stand for all New Zealanders
that has really to be respected in the marae...and it's to work out in
a way that makes it both comfortable and warm for any iwi who come here,
but
comfortable
and warm and part of the place for any paheka who is part of the Mana Taonga
that we talk about. That's the concept that we are trying to develop.
Whiting: There are two main fields that have to be explored, and one that
is most important is its customary role in the first place, because marae
comes
of and comes from the tangatawhenua who are Maori. To change it...
Trotter: It's not just for Maori. (He begins thumping the table.)
Trotter: ... You must get that. If it is... a Maori institution and nothing
more, this marae has failed, and they must get that idea...because we are
bicultural. Bicultural talks about two people, and if it's going to be
totally Maori, and
all driven by Maori protocols, and without regard for the life -'museum'
is a pakeha concept.
I will not, I'd rather be without a marae, if women can't speak on the
marae, so we're all going to be Ngati Porou, because they let women speak.
But we
can't have a kawa that says women won't speak. I will not chair an institution
headed by a woman if she can't...stand there in her own right. Now I know
there are sensitivities by... some iwi, but we've got to be bold enough
to say we're
going to make our own kawa. And I don't mind if 75% of iwi are a bit irritated,
that we are being more liberal because we're going the Ngati Porou way,
but at least within Maoridom there are both sides to that debate...and
so we
will go - we want to to be able to put a bicultural spin on the ball, is
what I'm
saying, and I say, this has to satisfy both cultures.
Whiting: And yes, I would say that I support that, but it has to satisfy
both and not be compromised. I just had to suppress a lot of inner feeling,
mainly
because it's what I do know, of a life-long experience is that to gain
some of the ground forward is to actually at times to have to take that
sort of
crap. And there are lots of things which I found very arrogant and contained
a lot of ignorance. Somebody who doesn't know Maori culture, doesn't know
Maori full stop, to come in and start to want to change a very important
part of
the culture, and, you saw it. It's one of the major threats for instance,
of the maintenance of Maori culture. It's very fragile. If the museum is
about
remembering, discovering and all of those kinds of high ideals in terms
of education etc, it should be able to cope with such an ordinary, what
I see
such an ordinary straightforward cultural uniqueness and difference.That
was Cliff Whiting and Sir Ron Trotter. Culture clashes. This place we're
sitting
in is built on an argument. It is an argument that we're leading the world
in. I hope we're always having it. It is an important part of who we are.
We shouldn't be looking for resolution. It is important that this argument
must
go on and on. I have noticed a change though. I've noticed that we are
starting to develop some real cultural confidence in expressing ourselves.
It is remarkable
that both those men saw that piece of footage in our documentary and both
thought it really important that it was screened to the nation. They were
confident.
We don't see ourselves on screen enough to be confident yet.
I agree with Ruth Harley that there is a real link between the knowledge-based
economy and the electronic expressive medium. In fact, there was a graph
that Howard showed us illustrating the comparison between Korean and Kenyan
development
into the knowledge-based economy. Howard didn't mention one difference
between Korea and Kenya. At the same time Korea put in place their involvement
in
the knowledge-based economy they also put in place what amounted to a very
big
local content legislation on their local film distribution industry, which
meant that exhibitors in Korea had to screen Korean films. Kenya did not
do this.
It is great if the institutional life of this country could be more focused
on what we euphemistically call the cultural sector. It is unruly. It is
an unweeded garden, It is full of rude, crude iconoclasts who get up every
morning
and like me are driven creatures who haven't got steady money coming in
every week, but define this nation and its culture daily.
I'd be really worried if the bureaucrats decided to sit in rooms and define
our culture because you'll never be able to define it. And there are all
these people out there who were downsized and outplaced before those words
were invented.
They are doing it every day of their lives. They define it and redefine
it and express it in so many wonderful ways that you couldn't even dream
of.
So I urge you to water them, water the garden, value it, pay it some heed.
It is the artists of New Zealand who will brand this country very clearly
and very strongly in all its wonderful, terrible ways. I'm going to leave
the last
word with Hone Tuwhare, the New Zealand poet laureate. This is what he
said when we asked him a simple question. We asked him about a poster on
his wall.
I think it illustrates the kind of brain that you can't pickle. It is us.
Hone looks quizzically at a large poster on his wall that has the head
of Karl Marx superimposed over the figure of a construction worker.
" Oh that - yes - that's Karl eh? Karl Marx. Armed with a cigarette and
not a pen. He's got his hard hat there. And he's looking quizzical. Yeah quizzical.
He's a bit silly though. I told him to give up smoking but he wouldn't listen
so he died.
(Laughter from behind cameras.)
"
Course he had his family problems too. Oh yes. He was said to be fucking his
housekeeper but when you're a busy executive - as you are - you're a busy executive,
you need a bit of sweets on the side. A sweetener. It's good for the morale,
for the morals,....I suppose you could say I'm amoral but I don't know what
that word means, I'd have to look it up in the dictionary. Of course I do go
to Church, yeah, I go down the Presbyterian church..." Fade to black.Thank
you.

|